AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Bridgestone firestone employee handbook4/25/2023 A jury entered judgment for the owner of $322,090, and the manufacturer appealed. Owner’s expert testified that the damage could have been prevented using another installation technique. Evidence demonstrated that the leaks were caused by puncture holes in the defendant-supplied membrane where it came in contact with metal fasteners supplied by others. Defendant repaired approximately 50 roof leaks before announcing it would no longer do so, on the basis that they were not covered by the warranty. Defendant issued a limited warranty for the roof, excluding damage to the roof caused by materials supplied by others. A subcontractor installed the roof, using some components supplied by defendant, and some components supplied by others. Plaintiff owner of shopping center project sued defendant roofing system component manufacturer, alleging breach of warranty. Prince William Square Associates, 250 Va. VIRGINIA FEDERAL AND APPELLATE CASE SUMMARIES,Ħ01.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |